Journalists work at desks in a large television newsroom.
Journalists work at desks in a large television newsroom. Photo by James Cridland / Wikimedia Commons. Image source
B1 · IntermediateGlobal·Culture & Everyday Life

Which Disasters Make International News?

Key Vocabulary

cross-border coverage

news reporting about an event happening in another country

The earthquake received extensive cross-border coverage.

hazard

an event or condition that can cause harm

Drought is a serious environmental hazard.

severity

how serious or damaging something is

The severity of the disaster affected the amount of news attention.

visibility

how noticeable or widely seen something is

Television images increased the event's international visibility.

news value

a quality that makes an event seem important or interesting to journalists

A sudden dramatic event often has strong news value.

Article

After a major disaster, people often assume the whole world will hear about it. A new study suggests that international news attention is much less even. Researchers examined how media outlets in many countries reported disasters abroad and found that some kinds of events attract far more coverage than others. [1]

The study, published in Nature Human Behaviour on August 14, analyzed about 135 million news articles from 466 outlets in 123 countries and 44 languages. The researchers connected those stories with records of natural disasters between 2016 and 2023. [1][2]

Sudden, dramatic events received the strongest international attention. Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides and wildfires were more likely to appear in foreign news. Slower or more familiar hazards, including floods, droughts, storms and extreme temperatures, generally received less cross-border coverage. [1]

Severity still mattered. Disasters with more deaths tended to receive more attention, especially when the number of fatalities was very high. But the type of disaster mattered too, which means two serious events could receive very different levels of international visibility. [1][2]

Connections between countries also influenced coverage. News outlets paid more attention to disasters in places with stronger social or cultural links to their own country. Distance alone did not explain the pattern. [1][3]

This matters because news attention can shape what international audiences notice, discuss and support. The researchers do not argue that journalists deliberately ignore slower disasters. Instead, their results show how news values, dramatic images and relationships between countries can influence which emergencies travel across borders. [1][2]

For readers, the study offers a useful question to ask when a disaster dominates the headlines: what other serious events might be happening without receiving the same international attention?

Discussion Questions

  1. Which kinds of disasters receive the most news attention in your country, and why?
  2. How much should dramatic images influence what news organizations cover?
  3. What problems can occur when slower disasters receive less international attention?
  4. How do personal or cultural connections affect which foreign countries people care about?
  5. What could journalists do to keep important but less dramatic emergencies visible?

References

  1. Fetzer and Garg, "Uneven patterns of cross-border media coverage following natural disasters," Nature Human Behaviour. Source
  2. University of Warwick, "Research finds that global media distorts coverage of climate disasters." Source
  3. University of Bonn, "Droughts and Floods Attract Little Media Attention." Source

Finished reading? Mark this lesson as done.